mirrored file at http://SaturnianCosmology.Org/ 
For complete access to all the files of this collection
	see http://SaturnianCosmology.org/search.php 
==========================================================
[LINK] 

This Week's Issue [LINK] 
News [LINK] Opinion [LINK] 
Arts & Entertainment [LINK] Comics [LINK] 
Sports [LINK] Intramurals [LINK] 
_________________________________________________________________

Online Features [LINK] 
Speak Your Mind! [LINK] 
Planet of Sound [LINK] 
_________________________________________________________________

Archives / Search [LINK] 
_________________________________________________________________

About:
About the Yale Herald [LINK] 
About YH Online [LINK] 

The legacy of Julian Jaynes

Bastard Hat
By David Auerbach

headshot Julian Jaynes is dead, but I'm going to leave him aside for
now to look at the buried legacy of Charles Fort (1874-1932). While
the Fortean Times continues to publish arch examinations of Wilhelm
Reich, Immanuel Velikovsky, and other crackpots, Fort's own work is
reprinted in series with the most drug-addled or Marxism-saddled
ramblings of Foucault and Kathy Acker, and the ethos of Fort's work
has diffused its way through the world. Fort's most infamous idea--"I
think we're property" (of higher beings)--was ripped off in countless
pulps and was partly responsible for the establishment of one or two
religious organizations.

Fort was roundly dismissed by scholars of his day as a cross between
Robert Ripley and P.T. Barnum, with all the exhibitionistic trappings
of both. However, Fort's sincerity surpassed a lust for fame: of his
anecdotes and conclusions, he wrote, "I no more believe them than I
believe that twice two are four."

He had probably read Notes from Underground, but was too flighty to be
nihilistic--he preferred rubber cement to Ockham's Razor. He is the
patron saint of all the urban legends and conspiracy theories of this
century, but also of relativism.

Fort loved exceptions and corner cases, and so the story of Kaspar
Hauser caught his attention. Hauser turned up in Nuremberg one day in
1828, barely able to walk or speak, and later claimed that he had been
kept in a cell since birth. Fort launches from the story into a
bizarre sequence of suppositions about teleportation, alien transport,
and the indeterminacy of history, and leaves them hanging firmly in
the air.

Which brings me to Julian Jaynes, the only writer who maintained a
shred of credibility in most people's eyes while effectively pursuing
the same course as Fort. Jaynes passed away last Nov. 21, which I only
recently discovered, due to the generally low profile he kept after
the publication of one brilliant book, The Origin of Consciousness in
the Bicameral Mind.

Jaynes wrote it as an all-encapsulating treatise on the very recent
evolution of the human brain, postulating that we had only 3,000 years
ago shaken off a left/right-brain split that had until then made the
right brain act as "god" to the left, producing visual and auditory
hallucinations. Schizophrenia in Jaynes's framework is a regression to
this "bicameral" state, so that people such as Bruno S. would exist in
a pre-modern state of awareness.

Jaynes was far removed from the mainstream, and was as criticized by
the conservatives as he was embraced by the extremists. Many
disagreed, and it's not difficult to do so, but reading Jaynes to be
convinced is for the narrow-minded. Jaynes stood in the nexus of
ancient history, Vico, modern academia, and a good deal of Forteanism,
and if any scholar could be said to have been in Bruno S.'s state of
"other-awareness," it would be him. His main achievement for me was in
re-mythologizing humanity.

In 1988, Life asked Jaynes to contribute a comment on the meaning of
life. Sandwiched between the homilies of Armand Hammer and Norman
Vincent Peale ("Approach Life the Joy Way!") is Jaynes's Fortean
answer: "This question has no answer except in the history of how it
came to be asked. There is no answer because words have meaning, not
life or persons or the universe itself. Our search for certainty rests
in our attempts at understanding the history of all individual selves
and all civilizations. Beyond that, there is only awe."

Back to Opinion...
_________________________________________________________________

All materials © 1998 The Yale Herald, Inc., and its staff.
Got any questions, comments, or advice? Email the online editors at
herald-online at yale.edu.
Like to join us?